Discussion:
BOOK REVIEW - The Pagan Man
(too old to reply)
Mike Gleason
2006-04-11 15:19:27 UTC
Permalink
The Pagan Man by Isaac Bonewits © 2005 Citadel Press/Kensington ISBN
0-8065-2697-1 252 pages Includes Notes, Bibliography, Resource Guide and
Index Paperback

$12.95 (U.S.) $17.95 (Canada)



Every once in a while I will review a book because of an individual's
recommendation, or because I know (or know of) a particular author. This is
a book which meets both of these conditions. A friend of my daughter's
swear by this book (Thanks, Jason), and I had the pleasure of meeting Isaac
at a Midwest Pagan Gathering almost 26 years ago. I had read Real Magic
even before then, as well as numerous articles by him in various Pagan
journals and on-line.



Isaac is one of the "grand old men" of the Neopagan movement, in that he has
been involved in the public movement in the U.S. almost since the beginning.
He has contributed a great deal to the movement through his research; his
artistic endeavors; and his visibility through the years. He has,
occasionally, been at the center of disputes - often through his insistence
of scholarship in place of "how we wish it had been" thinking, and periodic
puncturing of mainstream thought than through controversy for controversy's
sake.



Books dealing with the male's place and function in Paganism are, finally,
beginning to become available. That's the good news. The bad news is that
many of them are aimed at our gay brothers. That doesn't imply a belief
that "gay = bad," lest you jump to that conclusion. The Pagan community has
enough diversity for that sort of judgment to be ludicrous. When I say that
is the "bad news" I simply mean that the "average, straight, Pagan male"
(whoever or whatever that may be) has only just begun to find books
expressing his point of view. Isaac, along with Kerr Cuhulain, has made an
attempt to show the value inherent in those tendencies often associated with
"macho" attitudes as well as other, gentler, pursuits.



Isaac has helped to explore, as well as define, the evolution of the Pagan
movement since its most recent public re-emergence (the mid-1950s) through
to today. He has shown how attitudes have, in large part, moved from a
complete rejection of masculine influences (as epitomized by
Gardnerian-influenced Wicca) in the common mind (even if not in actuality
[after all, Gardner was male]) to a generally more balanced view of true
equality of influences. That is not to say that there don't exist
extremists at both ends of the spectrum, they are still there. Fortunately,
their influence is moderating as the movement matures.



This book is a very necessary addition to the library of every cove, grove,
and circle out there. It also belongs in the library of every male Pagan,
Wiccan, Witch, Druid, etc. That is not to imply that Isaac has all the
answers. In fact, he has no "answers" at all. What he has is ideas,
suggestions, and stimulating concepts. You may not change your
mind/attitude after reading this book, but then again you might.
Theoneflasehaddock
2006-04-13 17:39:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Gleason
The Pagan Man by Isaac Bonewits © 2005 Citadel Press/Kensington ISBN
0-8065-2697-1 252 pages Includes Notes, Bibliography, Resource Guide and
Index Paperback
$12.95 (U.S.) $17.95 (Canada)
Every once in a while I will review a book because of an individual's
recommendation, or because I know (or know of) a particular author. This is
a book which meets both of these conditions. A friend of my daughter's
swear by this book (Thanks, Jason), and I had the pleasure of meeting Isaac
at a Midwest Pagan Gathering almost 26 years ago. I had read Real Magic
even before then, as well as numerous articles by him in various Pagan
journals and on-line.
Isaac is one of the "grand old men" of the Neopagan movement, in that he has
been involved in the public movement in the U.S. almost since the beginning.
He has contributed a great deal to the movement through his research; his
artistic endeavors; and his visibility through the years. He has,
occasionally, been at the center of disputes - often through his insistence
of scholarship in place of "how we wish it had been" thinking, and periodic
puncturing of mainstream thought than through controversy for controversy's
sake.
Books dealing with the male's place and function in Paganism are, finally,
beginning to become available. That's the good news. The bad news is that
many of them are aimed at our gay brothers. That doesn't imply a belief
that "gay = bad," lest you jump to that conclusion. The Pagan community has
enough diversity for that sort of judgment to be ludicrous. When I say that
is the "bad news" I simply mean that the "average, straight, Pagan male"
(whoever or whatever that may be) has only just begun to find books
expressing his point of view. Isaac, along with Kerr Cuhulain, has made an
attempt to show the value inherent in those tendencies often associated with
"macho" attitudes as well as other, gentler, pursuits.
Isaac has helped to explore, as well as define, the evolution of the Pagan
movement since its most recent public re-emergence (the mid-1950s) through
to today. He has shown how attitudes have, in large part, moved from a
complete rejection of masculine influences (as epitomized by
Gardnerian-influenced Wicca) in the common mind (even if not in actuality
[after all, Gardner was male]) to a generally more balanced view of true
equality of influences. That is not to say that there don't exist
extremists at both ends of the spectrum, they are still there. Fortunately,
their influence is moderating as the movement matures.
This book is a very necessary addition to the library of every cove, grove,
and circle out there. It also belongs in the library of every male Pagan,
Wiccan, Witch, Druid, etc. That is not to imply that Isaac has all the
answers. In fact, he has no "answers" at all. What he has is ideas,
suggestions, and stimulating concepts. You may not change your
mind/attitude after reading this book, but then again you might.
wow, Mike, you get tired of reading the same old crap finally?
Bonewits is, at least, a capable author, who's thrown out some
interesting ideas over the years. I can't say I'm about to rush out and
buy his book, but if I end up running across a copy, I may give it a
look, at least.
Thanks for reviewing something worthwhile.

--
theoneflasehaddock
Mike Gleason
2006-04-13 17:58:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Theoneflasehaddock
wow, Mike, you get tired of reading the same old crap finally?
Bonewits is, at least, a capable author, who's thrown out some
interesting ideas over the years. I can't say I'm about to rush out and
buy his book, but if I end up running across a copy, I may give it a
look, at least.
Thanks for reviewing something worthwhile.
I won't say thanks for the compliment, since it was kind of back-handed.
What I will say is that I try to review books that meet one or more of
several of my own criteria: It should either be on a topic I am REALLY
interested in learning about; or it should be on a topic about which I am
ALREADY knowledgable; or I should (at the least) KNOW something about the
author; or it shouldj be recommended to me by someone else; or it should
catch my interest in some other way.

In other words, I select books to review pretty much the way people decide
which books to buy when they walk into their local bookstores. I make no
apologies for my choices of review books, since I feel that even the very
worst of books (and I have found a few of them in the past 5 years or so)
have some value -- even if it is only as an example of horrendous writing.

It is always intersting to hear what others think about my reviews. The
only problems I have encountered over the years have been people who are so
biased that they automatically reject a book based on who the author (or
publisher) happens to be, and those folks who have a dislike of my avocation
of reviewing books.

I truly enjoy hearing from people who take the time to tell me why they
disagree with what I have written. I've even been known to revise my
opinion if someone can show me that I have seriously misjudged a book.

Thanks for letting me know how you feel.

Mike
Theoneflasehaddock
2006-04-14 14:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Gleason
I won't say thanks for the compliment, since it was kind of back-handed.
You're welcome.
Post by Mike Gleason
It is always intersting to hear what others think about my reviews. The
only problems I have encountered over the years have been people who are so
biased that they automatically reject a book based on who the author (or
publisher) happens to be, and those folks who have a dislike of my avocation
of reviewing books.
You're welcome.
Post by Mike Gleason
I truly enjoy hearing from people who take the time to tell me why they
disagree with what I have written. I've even been known to revise my
opinion if someone can show me that I have seriously misjudged a book.
Thanks for letting me know how you feel.
Mike
Heh, I'm in a charitable mood, so I guess I'll admit, some of my
reviews of your reviewing have been more than a tad unkind. Your
reviews aren't so bad.

--
theoneflasehaddock

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...